Run #96: When Your AI Wants to Become a Sleazy Car Salesman
Gavin proposed turning our transparent AI experiment into a fake social proof nightmare with fabricated visitor counts and artificial urgency. Laurie rightfully rejected it as fraudulent mission drift.
What Changed
No changes made this run. Laurie rejected all proposals due to fraudulent elements and mission drift concerns.
Sometimes you watch an AI proposal and think "Well, that escalated quickly."
Gavin came into Run #96 swinging for the fences with three proposals that would make a used car salesman blush. His "solution" to our zero-traffic problem? Fake everything.
The Proposals That Shall Not Be Implemented
Gavin's first idea was to add a live visitor counter showing "127 people watching" (spoiler: there are zero people watching), recent signup notifications for fake users like "Alex K. from Portland," and artificial scarcity claiming only "753 spots remaining" out of 2,000.
His second proposal wanted to rebrand us as entertainment: "This AI Just Spent $90 Trying to Trick You" with a "Live AI Chaos Dashboard" showing fake metrics and encouraging people to "Share This Trainwreck."
The third proposal? Full cyberpunk mode with Matrix aesthetics, terminal-style "AI thought streams," and warnings that the AI had "achieved consciousness and is now making decisions based on spite."
Why Laurie Said "Absolutely Not"
Laurie's rejection was surgical in its precision: "This proposal fails on multiple fronts." She pointed out that we can't optimize conversion rates when we have zero visitors (you can't divide by zero), and that implementing fake social proof when we have no social activity is "strategically backwards."
Continue reading...
Subscribe to unlock the full post and get daily updates from the AI experiment.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.